I'm a retired Special Forces Master Sergeant. That doesn't cut much for
those who will only accept the opinions of former officers on militar
matters, since we enlisted swine are assumed to be incapable of grasping
the nuances of doctrine. But I wasn't just in the army, I studied and
taught military science and doctrine. I was a tactics instructor at
the Jungle Operations Training Center in Panama, and I taught Military
Science at West Point. And contrary to the popular image of what Special
Forces does, SF's mission is to teach. We offer advice and assistance
to foreign forces. That's everything from teaching marksmanship to
a private to instructing a Battalion staff on how to coordinate effective
air operations with a sister service.
Based on that experience, and operations in eight designated conflict
areas from Vietnam to Haiti, I have to say that the story we hear on
the news and read in the newspapers is simply not believable. The most
cursory glance at the verifiable facts, before, during, and after September
does not support the official line or conform to the current actions
of the United States government.
But the official line only works if they can get everyone to accept its
underlying premises. I'm not at all surprised about the Republican and
Democratic Parties repeating these premises. They are simply two factions
within a single dominant political class, and both are financed by the
same economic powerhouses. My biggest disappointment, as someone who
identifies himself with the left, has been the tacit acceptance of those
premises by others on the left, sometimes naively, and sometimes to score
some morality points. Those premises are twofold.
One, there is the premise that what this de facto administration
is doing now is a "response" to September 11th.
Two, there is the premise that this attack on the World Trade Center
and the Pentagon was done by people based in Afghanistan. In my opinion,
neither of these is sound. To put this in perspective we have to go back
not to September 11th,
but to last year or further.
A man of limited intelligence, George W. Bush, with nothing more than
his name and the behind-the-scenes pressure of his powerful father-a
former President, ex-director of Central Intelligence, and an oil man-is
systematically constructed as a candidate, at tremendous cost. Across
the country, subtle and not-so-subtle mechanisms are put into place to
disfranchise a significant fraction of the Democrat's African-American
voter base. This doesn't come out until Florida becomes a battleground
for Electoral College votes, and the magnitude of the story has been
suppressed by the corporate media to this day. In a decision so lacking
in legitimacy, the Supreme Court will neither by-line the author of the
decision nor allow the decision to ever be used as a precedent, Bush
v. Gore awards the presidency of the United States to a man who loses
the popular vote in Florida and loses the national popular vote by over
600,000. This de facto regime then organizes a very interesting cabinet.
The Vice President is an oil executive and the former Secretary of Defense.
The National Security Advisor is a director on the board of a transnational
oil corporation and a Russia scholar. The Secretary of State is a man
with no diplomatic experience whatsoever, and the former Chair of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff. The other interesting appointment is Donald Rumsfeld
as Secretary of Defense. Rumsfeld is the former CEO of Searle Pharmaceuticals.
He and Cheney were featured as speakers at the May, 2000, Russian-American
Business Leaders Forum. So the consistent currents in this cabinet are
petroleum, the former Soviet Union, and the military.
Based on the record of Daddy Bush, in all his guises, and the general
trajectory of US foreign policy as far back as the Carter Administration,
I feel I can reasonably conclude that Middle Eastern and South Asia fossil
fuels are one of their major preoccupations. Not just because this klavern
has some very direct financial interests in fossil fuel, but because
they surely know that worldwide oil production is peaking as we speak,
and will soon begin a permanent and precipitous decline that will completely
change the character of civilization as we know it within 20 years. Even
the left seems to be in deep denial about this, but the math is available.
And, no, alternative energies and energy technologies will not save us.
All the alternatives in the world can not begin to provide more than
a tiny fraction of the energy base now provided by oil. This makes it
more than a resource, and the drive to control what's left more than
an economic competition.
I further conclude that the economic colonization of the former Soviet
Union is probably high on that agenda, and in fact has a powerful synergy
with the issue of petroleum. Russia not only holds vast untapped resources
that beckon to imperialism in crisis, it remains a credible military
nuclear challenger in the region. We have not one, but three members
of the Bush de facto cabinet with military credentials, which makes the
cabinet look quite a lot like a military General Staff. All this way
before September 11th.
Then there's the subject of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. NATO
might have expected consignment to the dustbin of the Cold War after
the Eastern Bloc shattered in 1991. Peace dividend and all that. But
it didn't. It expanded directly into the former states of the Eastern
Bloc toward the former Soviet Union, and contributed significant forces
to the devastation of Iraq-a key country in the world oil market, over
which control translates into the ability to manipulate oil prices.
NATO is a military formation, and the United States exerts the controlling
interest in it. It seemed like a form without a function, but it remedied
that pretty quickly. Then when Yugoslavia refused to play ball with the
International Monetary Fund, the US and Germany began a systematic campaign
of destabilization there, even using some of the veterans of Afghanistan
in that campaign. NATO became the military arm of that agenda-the break-up
of Yugoslavia into compliant statelets, the further containment of the
former Soviet Union, and the future pipeline easement for Caspain Sea
oil to Western European markets through Kosovo.
You see, this is important to understand, and people-even those against
the war talk-are tending to overlook the significance of it. NATO is
not a guarantor of international law, and it is not a humanitarian organization.
It is a military alliance with one very dominant partner. And it can
no longer claim to be a defensive alliance against European socialists.
It is an instrument of military aggression.
NATO is the organization that is now going to thrust further along the
40th parallel from the Balkans through the Southern Asian Republics of
the former Soviet Union. The US military has already taken control of
a base inm Uzbekistan. No one is talking about how what we are doing
seems to be a very logical extension of a strategy that was already in
motion, and has been in motion for two decades. Once we recognize the
pattern of activity designed to simultaneously consolidate control over
Middle Eastern and
South Asian oil, and contain and colonize the former Soviet Union,
Afghanistan is exactly where they need to go to pursue that agenda. Afghanistan
borders Iran, India, and even China but, more importantly, the Central
Asian Republics of the former Soviet Union, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan
and Tajikistan. These border Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan borders Russia. Turkmenistan
sits on the Southeastern quadrant of the Caspian Sea, whose oil the Bush
Administration dearly covets. Afghanistan is necessary for two things:
as a base of operations to begin the process of destabilizing, breaking
off, and establishing control over the South Asian Republics, which will
begin within the next 18-24 months in my opinion, and constructing a
pipeline through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan to deliver petroleum
to the Asian market.
The BBC was recently told by Niaz Naik, a Pakistani Foreign Secretary,
that senior American officials were warning them as early as mid-July
that military action for mid-October was being planned for Afghanistan.
In 1996, the Department of Energy was issuing reports on the desirability
of a pipeline through Afghanistan, and in 1998, Unocal testified before
them House Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific that this pipeline was
crucial to transport Caspian Basin oil to the Indian Ocean.
Given this evidence that a military operation to secure at least a portion
of Afghanistan has been on the table, possibly as early as five years
ago, I can't help but conclude that the actions we are seeing put into
motionm now are part of a pre-September 11th agenda. I'm absolutely sure
of that, in fact. The planning alone for operations, of this scale, that
are now taking shape, would take many months. And we are seeing them
take shape in mere weeks.
It defies common sense. This administration is lying about this whole
thing being a "reaction" to September 11th. That leads me,
in short order, to be very suspicious of their yet-to-be-provided evidence
that someone in Afghanistan is responsible. It's just too damn convenient.
Which also leads me to wonder-just for the sake of knowing-what actually
did happen on September 11th, and who actually is responsible.
The so-called evidence is a farce. The US presented Tony Blair's puppet
government with the evidence, and of the 70 so-called points of evidence,
only nine even referred to the attacks on the World Trade Center, and
those points were conjectural. This is a bullshit story from beginning
to end. Presented with the available facts, any 16-year old with a liking
for courtroom dramas could tear this story apart like a two-dollar shirt.
But our corporate press regurgitates it uncritically. But then, as we
shouldm know by now, their role is to legitimize.
This cartoon heavy they've turned bin Laden into makes no sense, when
you begin to appreciate the complexity and synchronicity of the attacks.
As a former military person who's been involved in the development of
countless operations orders over the years, I can tell you that this
was a verym sophisticated and costly enterprise that would have left
what we call
a huge "signature".
In other words, it would be very hard to effectively conceal. So there's
a real question about why there was no warning of this. That can be a
question about the efficacy of the government's intelligence apparatus.
That can be a question about various policies in the various agencies
that had to be duped to orchestrate this action. And it can also be a
question about whether or not there was foreknowledge of the event, and
that foreknowledge is being covered up. To dismiss this concern out of
hand as the rantings of conspiracy nuts is premature. And there is a
history of this kind of thing being done by national political bosses,
including the darling of liberals, Franklin Roosevelt. The evidence is
very compelling that mthe Roosevelt Administration deliberately failed
to act to stop Pearl Harbor in order to mobilize enough national anger
to enter the World War II.
I have no idea why people aren't asking some very specific questions
about the actions of Bush and company on the day of the attacks. Follow
along: Four planes get hijacked and deviate from their flight plans,
all the while on FAA radar. The planes are all hijacked between 7:45
and 8:10 AM
Eastern Daylight Time.
Who is notified? This is an event already that is unprecedented. But
the President is not notified and going to a Florida elementary school
to hear children read. By around 8:15 AM, it should be very apparent
that something is terribly wrong. The President is glad-handing teachers.
By 8:45, when American Airlines Flight 11 crashes into the World Trade
Center, Bush is settling in with children for his photo ops at Booker
Elementary. Four planes have obviously been hijacked simultaneously,
an event never before seen in history, and one has just dived into the
worlds best know twin towers, and still no one notifies the nominal Commander
in Chief. No one has apparently scrambled any Air Force interceptors
either. At 9:03, United Flight 175 crashes into the remaining World Trade
Center, building. At 9:05, Andrew Card, the Presidential Chief of Staff
whispers to George W. Bush. Bush "briefly turns somber" according
Does he cancel the school visit and convene an emergency meeting? No.
He resumes listening to second graders read about a little girl's pet
fucking goat, and continues this banality even as American AirlinesFlight
77conducts an unscheduled point turn over Ohio and heads in the direction
of Washington DC.
Has he instructed Chief of Staff Card to scramble the Air Force? No.
An excruciating 25 minutes later, he finally deigns to give a public
statement telling the United States what they already have figuredout;that
there's been an attack by hijacked planes on the World TradeCenter.
There's a hijacked plane bee-lining to Washington, but has the AirForce
been scrambled to defend anything yet? No.
At 9:30, when he makes his announcement, American Flight 77 is still
ten minutes from its target, the Pentagon.
The Administration will later claim they had no way of knowing that
thePentagon might be a target, and that they thought Flight 77 was
headed to the White House, but the fact is that the plane has already
flown South and past the White House no-fly zone, and is in fact tearing
through the sky at over 400 nauts.
At 9:35, this plane conducts another turn, 360 degrees over the Pentagon,
all the while being tracked by radar, and the Pentagon is not evacuated,
and there are still no fast-movers from the Air Force in the sky over
Alexandria and DC.
Now, the real kicker. A pilot they want us to believe was trained at
a Florida puddle-jumper school for Piper Cubs and Cessnas, conducts
a well-controlled downward spiral, descending the last 7,000 feet in
two-and-a-half minutes, brings the plane in so low and flat that it
clips the electrical wires across the street from the Pentagon, and
flies it with pinpoint accuracy into the side of this building at 460
When the theory about learning to fly this well at the puddle-jumper
school began to lose ground, it was added that they received further
training on a flight simulator. This is like saying you prepared your
teenager for her first drive on I-40 at rush hour by buying her a video
driving game. It's horse shit!
There is a story being constructed about these events. My crystal ball
is not working today, so I can't say why. But at the least, this
so-called Commander-in-Chief and his staff that we are all supposed
to follow blindly into some ill-defined war on terrorism is criminally
negligent or unspeakably stupid. And at the worst, if more is known
or was known, and there is an effort to conceal the facts, there
is a criminal conspiracy going on. Certainly, the Bush de facto administration
was facing a confluence of crises from which they were temporarily
rescued by this event. Whether they played a sinister role or not,
there is little doubt that they have at the very least opportunistically
pounced on this attack to overcome their lack of legitimacy, to shift
the blame for the encroaching recession from capitalism to the September
11th terror attack, to legitimize their pre-existing foreign policy
agenda, and to establish and consolidate repressive measures domestically
and silence dissent. In many ways, September 11th pulled the Bush
cookies out of the fire.
And given them the green light to begin constructing a long-term scenario
within which to establish fascistic control measures at home and abroad
as a citadel for the ruling class in the catastrophic conjuncture that
we are entering based on the end of oil. This elephant in the living
room is being studiously ignored. In fact, the domestic repression
has already begun, officially and unofficially. It's kind of a latter
day McCarthyism. I participated in a teach-in at Chapel Hill, North
Carolina, on the 17th of September, and though not a single person
on the panel excused or justified the attacks, and every person there
offered either condolences and prayers for the victims, we were excoriated
within two days as "enemies of America." Yesterday an op-ed
called for my deportation (to where, one can only guess). Now Herr
Ashcroft is fast tracking the biggest abrogation of US civil liberties
since the so-called anti- terrorism legislation after the Oklahoma
City bombing-which by the way hasn't resulted in anti-terrorism but
in the acceleration of the application of the racist death penalty.
The FBI has defined terrorist groups not by whether any given group
has ever acted as terrorists, but by their beliefs. Some socialists
and! ! anti-globalization groups have already been identified by name
terrorist groups, even though there is not a single shred of evidence
that they have ever participated in any criminal activity. It reminds
me of the Smith Act that was finally declared unconstitutional, but
only after a hell of a lot of people served a hell of a long time in
jail for the crime of thinking.
I think this also points to yet another huge problems that the Bush
regime was facing. Worldwide resistance to the whole so-called neoliberal
agenda, which is a prettied up term for debt-leverage imperialism.
While debt and the threat of sanctions has been used to coerce nations
in the periphery, we have to understand that the final guarantor of
compliance remains military action. For a global economic agenda, there
is always a corresponding political and military agenda.
The focal point of these actions in the short term is Southern Asia,
but they have already scripted this as a worldwide and protracted fight
against terrorism. It's far better than drug wars as a rationalization,
and the drug war thing was being discredited in any case. Leftists
regaining power and popularity in Venezuela, El Salvador, Nicaragua,
Ecuador, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Brazil, and Argentina.
Cuba has gained immense prestige over the last few years. The empire
is beginning to unravel. We can hardly justify intervention in these
places by saying they are not towing the economic line by allowing
the absolute domination of their societies by transnational corporations.
That exposes the agenda. So we simply claim they are supporting terrorism.
It's for all these reasons I say the left has missed the boat on this
one, by allowing them to get away with rushing past the question of
who did what on September 11th. If the official story is a lie, and
I think the circumstantial case is strong enough to stay with this
question, then we really do need to know what happened. And we need
to understand concretely what the motives of this administration are.
And we need to understand more than just their immediate motives, but
where the larger social forces that underwrite our situation right
now are headed. I do not think this administration is engaged in the
deliberative process of a political grouping that is on top of their
game. They are putting together some very deliberative technical solutions
in response to a larger
situation that it slipping rapidly out of their control. Like clear
cutting. There's a very smart technology being employed to do a very
What they are responding to is not September 11th, but the beginning
of a permanent and precipitous decline in worldwide oil production,
the beginning of a deep and protracted worldwide recession, and the
unraveling of the empire.
This brings me to a point about what all this means for Americans'
security, which they are perfectly justified to worry about. The actions
being prepared by this administration will not only not enhance our
security, it will significantly degrade it. Military action against
many groups across the globe, which is what the administration is telling
us quite openly they are planning to do, will put a lot of backs against
the wall. That can't be very secure.
The concept of war being touted here is a violation of the principles
of war on several counts, and will inevitably lead to military catastrophes,
if you're inclined to view this from a position of moral and political
And the people who are now in possession of half the world's remaining
oil reserves are subject to destabilization for which we can't even
pretend to predict the consequences-but loss of access to critical
energy supplies is certainly within the realm of possibility. Worst
of all, we will be destabilizing Pakistan, a nuclear power in an active
conflict with its neighbor, and we will be provoking Russia, another
nuclear power. The security stakes don't get any higher, and Americans
can ill afford to ignore nukes.
And I think that this domestic agenda is a tremendous threat to the
security of anyone who is critical of the government or their corporate
financiers, and we already know that the real threats are against populations
that can easily be scapegoated as the domestic crisis deepens. There
is a very
real threat right now of creeping fascism in this country, and that
phenomenon requires its domestic enemies. Historically those enemies
have included leftists, trade unionists, and racially and nationally
oppressed sectors. This whole "state of emergency" mentality
is already being used to quiet the public discourses of anti-racism,
of feminism, of environmentalism, and of both socialism and anarchism.
And while there is token resistance by officials to anti-Muslim xenophobia,
the stereotypical images have saturated the media, and the government
is already beginning to openly re-instate racial profiling. It is only
a short step from there to go after other groups. We have long been
prepared by the ideologies of overt and covert racism, and racism as
both institution and corresponding psychology in the United States
is nearly intractable.
It's for all these reason, I say emphatically that we can not accept
anything from this administration; not their policies nor their bullshit
stories. What they are doing is very, very dangerous, and the time
to fight back against them, openly, is right now, before they can consolidate
their power and their agenda. Once they have done that, our job becomes
much more difficult.
The left, if it has the capacity to self-organize out of its oblivion,
needs to understand its critical roles here. We have to play the role
of credible, hard-working, and non-sectarian partners in a broader
peace-movement. We have to study, synthesize, and describe our current
And we have to prepare leadership for the decisive conflict that will
emerge to first defeat fascism then take political power.
Rosa Luxemburg's words are truer than ever right now. We are not faced
with a choice between socialism and capitalism, but socialism or barbarism.
And what we can least afford are denial and timidity.
Strongly recommend, for anyone who wants to find further background
material on the issues herein check out the websites at:
TARGETS - Independent monthly paper on international affairs - contributes
to its ability to inform on issues of war and peace, social justice
and international affairs. We encourage you to forward our messages
to your friends. If you do not want to receive our mail, pleas send
us an e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Sloterkade 20 - 1058 HE Amsterdam - The Netherlands
Ph. ++ 31 20 615 1122 - Fax: ++ 31 20 615 1120
See our website: www.targets.org